Published package / CLIR

eu.equality.burden_of_proof

v0.1.0

Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast)

A package can be printed as a standalone module in a general-purpose language that answers without the rules engine: an answer and its status, with no proof, hashes or canonical document. Everything on this page comes from the generation plan built with the index; the gallery computes nothing of its own.

Generation plan

The plan builds: the package can be printed as a module.

plan format
law-backend-plan/0.19
capabilities
defeasible, judgment, negation, norm, priority, priority:dated, status:not_known

Checked against package scenarios

Not checked: the package scenarios have not been run against generated modules. A plan that builds does not yet show that the answers coincide.

Target languages

print this plangopyts

refuse this plan · 13
  • bsl версия плана не поддержана эмиттером: 'law-backend-plan/0.19' (поддержана law-backend-plan/0.7)RU
  • cs версия плана не поддержана эмиттером: 'law-backend-plan/0.19' (поддержана law-backend-plan/0.7)RU
  • dart версия плана не поддержана эмиттером: 'law-backend-plan/0.19' (поддержана law-backend-plan/0.7)RU
  • erl версия плана не поддержана эмиттером: 'law-backend-plan/0.19' (поддержана law-backend-plan/0.7)RU
  • ex версия плана не поддержана эмиттером: 'law-backend-plan/0.19' (поддержана law-backend-plan/0.7)RU
  • java версия плана не поддержана эмиттером: 'law-backend-plan/0.19' (поддержана law-backend-plan/0.7)RU
  • kt версия плана не поддержана эмиттером: 'law-backend-plan/0.19' (поддержана law-backend-plan/0.7)RU
  • lua версия плана не поддержана эмиттером: 'law-backend-plan/0.19' (поддержана law-backend-plan/0.7)RU
  • php версия плана не поддержана эмиттером: 'law-backend-plan/0.19' (поддержана law-backend-plan/0.7)RU
  • rb версия плана не поддержана эмиттером: 'law-backend-plan/0.19' (поддержана law-backend-plan/0.7)RU
  • rs версия плана не поддержана эмиттером: 'law-backend-plan/0.19' (поддержана law-backend-plan/0.7)RU
  • scala версия плана не поддержана эмиттером: 'law-backend-plan/0.19' (поддержана law-backend-plan/0.7)RU
  • swift версия плана не поддержана эмиттером: 'law-backend-plan/0.19' (поддержана law-backend-plan/0.7)RU

Print the module from a repository checkout

./law dev backend corpus/clir/eu-burden-of-proof.lawir.json --target ts --target py --target go --out DIR

Module interface

Questions are public relations with a producing rule; inputs are the facts a question reads. Function names follow the language: ask_… in Python, ask.… in TypeScript, Ask… in Go.

Questions · 2

NameParametersMeaningReadsSources
issue_establishedtext, enumthe matter is established in the proceeding, by whichever party bore the burden of establishing itemployment_matterneutral_provision_appliedobjectively_justifiedparticular_disadvantage_for_one_sexparty_complainantparty_respondentpay_mattertreated_less_favourably_on_grounds_of_sexarticle/19
party_establishedtext, text, enumArticle 19(1). A party has established, before the court or other competent authority, the matter in questionemployment_matterneutral_provision_appliedobjectively_justifiedparticular_disadvantage_for_one_sexparty_complainantparty_respondentpay_mattertreated_less_favourably_on_grounds_of_sexarticle/19

Inputs · 8

NameParametersMeaning
employment_mattertext, textArticle 14(1). The matter concerns conditions for access to employment, vocational training, employment and working conditions including dismissals and pay, or membership of an organisation of workers or employers
neutral_provision_appliedtext, textArticle 2(1)(b). An apparently neutral provision, criterion or practice is applied to the person
objectively_justifiedtext, textArticle 2(1)(b). Whether the provision, criterion or practice is objectively justified by a legitimate aim and the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary
particular_disadvantage_for_one_sextext, textArticle 2(1)(b). The provision, criterion or practice would put persons of one sex at a particular disadvantage compared with persons of the other sex
party_complainanttext, textArticle 17(1). A person who considers himself or herself wronged by failure to apply the principle of equal treatment, before the court or other competent authority
party_respondenttext, textArticle 19(1). The respondent in the proceeding: the employer against whom the principle of equal treatment is invoked
pay_mattertext, textArticle 4. The matter concerns an aspect or condition of remuneration for the same work or for work to which equal value is attributed
treated_less_favourably_on_grounds_of_sextext, textArticle 2(1)(a). One person is treated less favourably on grounds of sex than another is, has been or would be treated in a comparable situation