Опубликованный пакет / CLIR

us.sdny.leonard_v_pepsico

v0.1.0

Leonard v. PepsiCo, Inc., 88 F. Supp. 2d 116 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)

Пломба §208sha256:4dfdbe3418956e45837d5bfee3030aa1a0850ff012c50f555e0adaa2b6dcd38e
Подключить / law.toml
[dependencies]
us.sdny.leonard_v_pepsico = "0.1.0"
Получить канонические байты
curl -O /blobs/4dfdbe3418956e45837d5bfee3030aa1a0850ff012c50f555e0adaa2b6dcd38e.lawir.json

Все адресуемые узлы пакета. Помеченные internal — не часть контракта: сослаться на них из другого пакета нельзя (§24). Свою страницу имеют только публичные символы.

symbol_decl — 70
УзелПодписьАнкеры §194
STATUTE_OF_FRAUDS_THRESHOLDthe price of $500 at or above which a contract for the sale of goods requires a signed writing (N.Y.U.C.C. § 2-201(1))1internal
accepted_by_performancethe claimant performed the conditions named in the communication as to the item1internal
accepted_the_order_formthe advertiser accepted the submitted order form and processed payment2internal
advertised_itemthe communication is an advertisement displaying the item at a stated price1internal
advertisementthe communication is an advertisement1internal
alleged_contract_onthe alleged contract is said to arise from the communication as to the item1internal
alleges_only_want_of_intention_to_performthe claim alleges only that the accused entered into a contract with no intention of performing it1internal
appropriate_for_summary_judgmentthe question is appropriate for resolution on summary judgment1internal
claim_failsthe claim cannot prevail as a matter of law1internal
collateral_to_a_separate_agreementthe representation was collateral to, or served as an inducement to, a separate agreement between the parties1internal
contract_claimthe claim is a claim for breach of contract or specific performance of the alleged contract1internal
contract_for_sale_of_goodsthe alleged contract is a contract for the sale of goods1internal
contract_formation_questionthe question is whether a contract was formed on the communication as to the item1internal
contract_formed_onan enforceable contract was formed1internal
cost_to_acceptthe money a would-be offeree must spend to amass the points the advertisement demands for the item1internal
deception_ofthe claimant relied on the representation1internal
deliveredthe item has been delivered to the claimant1internal
discovery_sought_into_advertiser_subjective_intentthe discovery sought would cast light on the advertiser's subjective intent in making the alleged offer1internal
discovery_sought_into_other_viewers_reactionsthe discovery sought would show how other individuals actually responded to the advertisement1internal
discovery_unavailingthe discovery sought is unavailing on the question1internal
displays_item_at_pointsthe communication displays the item at a stated number of Pepsi Points2internal
entitled_to_deliverythe claimant is entitled to delivery of the item by the seller1internal
establishes_contractual_relationshipthe writing by itself establishes a contractual relationship between the parties1internal
evidently_done_in_jestthe advertisement was evidently done in jest as to the item1internal
exaggerated_fantasythe scene depicted is an exaggerated fantasy of a kind that could not occur1internal
exaggerated_pufferythe advertisement makes exaggerated claims a reasonable viewer would understand as mere puffery, not as statements of fact1internal
falsity_ofthe representation is false1internal
for_the_courtthe question is one the court decides itself1internal
for_the_jurythe question is one for a jury1internal
fraud_claimthe claim is a claim of fraud brought by the claimant against the accused1internal
fraud_claim_failsjudgment on the fraud claim should enter for the accused1internal
fraud_establisheda cause of action for fraud is made out1internal
governing_law_ofthe law of this state governs the transaction1internal
identifies_who_may_acceptthe advertisement identifies the person who could accept1internal
improbable_performerthe person shown using the item in the advertisement is a highly improbable user of it1internal
indefinite_as_tothe advertisement is not sufficiently definite as to the item1internal
injury_fromthe claimant was injured by the reliance1internal
invitation_to_negotiatethe communication is an invitation to negotiate, not an offer1internal
invites_performance_of_a_specified_actthe advertisement invites anybody who performs the conditions named in it to obtain the item, without further communication1internal
item_absent_fromthe separate writing contains no entry or description of the item1internal
lacks_words_of_limitationthe advertisement contains no words of limitation such as «first come, first served»1internal
last_act_by_advertiser_inif the communication was a solicitation, the advertiser's acceptance of the order form was the last act, and it was done in this state1internal
last_act_by_offeree_inif the communication was an offer, the offeree's acceptance was the last act, and it was done in this state1internal
market_price_ofthe cost of the item1internal
military_purpose_ofthe primary mission of the item is to attack and destroy surface targets1internal
no_power_of_acceptancethe communication confers no power of acceptance as to the item1internal
objectively_understood_as_offeran objective, reasonable person would have understood the communication as an offer of the item1internal
offer_bythe submission is itself the offer, made by its sender1internal
offer_ofthe communication is an offer of the item1internal
order_form_ofthe writing is the order form of the promotion advertised2internal
price_ofthe price of the alleged contract1internal
priced_below_marketthe advertisement demands less for the item than the item costs1internal
promises_reward_for_performancethe advertisement is a promise of reward to anybody who performs the conditions named in it1internal
reasonable_person_would_understand_as_offeran objective, reasonable person would have understood the communication to convey an offer of the item1internal
refers_on_its_face_to_the_same_transactionthe unsigned writing refers on its face to the same transaction as the signed one1internal
representation_of_material_existing_factthe communication is a representation of a material existing fact1internal
requires_experience_of_subtle_social_dynamicsanswering the question requires current real-life experience of subtle social dynamics that a federal judge lacks1internal
reserves_details_tothe advertisement reserves the details of the alleged offer to a separate writing1internal
scienter_ofthe accused made the representation knowing it to be false1internal
seeks_reciprocal_promisethe advertisement seeks a reciprocal promise, expressed through acceptance of and compliance with the terms of an order form1internal
seller_ofthe party from whom performance of the alleged contract is sought1internal
signed_by_the_party_chargedthe writing is signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought, or by an authorized agent or broker1internal
states_steps_to_acceptthe advertisement states the steps a potential offeree must take to accept as to the item1internal
submittedthe sender submitted the completed order form seeking the item2internal
sufficient_writingthere is a writing sufficient to satisfy the statute of frauds1internal
sufficiently_definitethe advertisement is clear, definite and explicit as to the item1internal
unenforceable_for_want_of_writingthe alleged contract is not enforceable for want of a signed writing1internal
words_and_actions_so_clear_reasonable_people_could_not_differthe words and actions that allegedly formed a contract are so clear that reasonable people could not differ over their meaning1internal
writingthe communication is a writing1internal
writings_may_be_combinedthe unsigned writing may be read together with the signed one for the purposes of the statute of frauds1internal
type_decl — 7
УзелПодписьАнкеры §194
Claima claim brought or defended in the actioninternal
Communicationa communication: the commercial, the Catalog, the Order Form, a letter, a checkinternal
Iteman item of merchandise: a T-shirt, a leather jacket, a Harrier Jetinternal
Partya party: PepsiCo or Leonardinternal
Placea state whose law may govern the transactioninternal
Questiona question the court is asked to decideinternal
Transactionthe alleged contract of sale on which the claim restsinternal
rule — 35
УзелПодписьАнкеры §194
AbsenceOfWordsOfLimitationMakesIndefiniteThe absence of any words of limitation such as «first come, first served» renders the alleged offer sufficiently indefinite that no contract could be formed (Mesaros; Farnsworth)1internal
ActsEvidentlyDoneInJestConferNoPowerOfAcceptanceAn offer must be an act that leads the offeree reasonably to conclude that a power to create a contract is conferred; acts evidently done in jest or without intent to create legal relations are excluded (Corbin § 1.11; Graves v. Northern N.Y. Pub. Co.)1internal
AdvertisedItemAn advertisement displaying an item at a stated number of points advertises that item1internal
AdvertisementInducingPerformanceIsAPromiseOfRewardAn advertisement that invites performance of the conditions it names is a promise of reward to anybody who performs them (Carbolic Smoke Ball per Lindley L.J.)1internal
AdvertisementIsNotAnOfferAdvertisements of goods by display, sign, handbill, newspaper, radio or television are not ordinarily intended or understood as offers to sell; the presumption is the other way (Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 26 cmt. b; Corbin § 2.4; Lovett; Geismar; Gimbel Bros.)1internal
AnAdvertisementThatIsNoOfferIsAnInvitationAn advertisement which is not an offer is understood to be a mere request to consider and examine and negotiate — an invitation to negotiate (Corbin § 2.4; Lovett)1internal
BareWantOfIntentionToPerformIsNoFraudA cause of action does not generally lie where the plaintiff alleges only that the defendant entered into a contract with no intention of performing it (Grappo v. Alitalia; Rocanova v. Equitable Life)1internal
CarbolicSmokeBallExceptionAdvertisements offering rewards are offers to anybody who performs the conditions named in the advertisement, and anybody who does perform the condition accepts the offer (Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball; Barnes v. Treece; Newman v. Schiff; James v. Turilli)1internal
ClaimFailsBecauseNoReasonablePersonWouldHaveUnderstoodAnOfferSecond: the tongue-in-cheek attitude of the commercial would not cause a reasonable person to conclude that a soft drink company would be giving away fighter planes as part of a promotion3internal
ClaimFailsBecauseTheAdvertisementWasNotAnOfferFirst: the commercial was merely an advertisement, not a unilateral offer2internal
ClaimFailsForWantOfAWritingThird: there is no writing between the parties sufficient to satisfy the statute of frauds2internal
CommercialWasEvidentlyDoneInJestPuffery, an improbable user, an exaggerated fantasy, a military purpose and a price far below cost together show that the advertisement was evidently done in jest1internal
ConfluenceOfMemorandaA combination of signed and unsigned writings satisfies the statute provided the signed one establishes a contractual relationship and the unsigned one on its face refers to the same transaction (Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales; Horn & Hardart v. Pillsbury; Bruce Realty)1internal
ContractForFiveHundredOrMoreIsUnenforceableWithoutAWriting/R1A contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought (N.Y.U.C.C. § 2-201(1))1internal
ContractForFiveHundredOrMoreIsUnenforceableWithoutAWriting/R2A contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought (N.Y.U.C.C. § 2-201(1))1internal
ContractFormationMayBeResolvedOnSummaryJudgmentThe question whether a contract was formed is appropriate for resolution on summary judgment where the words and actions are so clear that reasonable people could not differ over their meaning (Krumme, Bourque, Wards Co.)1internal
DefinitenessOnTheFaceOfTheAdvertisementAn advertisement that itself displays the item and its price is, on its face, clear, definite and explicit as to that item1internal
DemandedPriceBelowCostWhere the money required to amass the advertised points is less than the cost of the item, the advertisement demands less for the item than it costs1internal
DiscoveryIntoOtherViewersIsUnavailingThat others may have interpreted the advertisement as an offer renders that belief neither more nor less reasonable: the alleged offer must be evaluated on its own terms1internal
DiscoveryIntoSubjectiveIntentIsUnavailingDiscovery into the advertiser's subjective intent is irrelevant to whether an objective, reasonable person would have understood the communication to be an offer (Kay-R Elec.; Mesaros; Corbin § 1.11)1internal
DutyToDeliverTheItemWhere the claimant is entitled to delivery, the seller owes the claimant delivery of the item — the specific performance plaintiff sought1internal
EntitlementToDeliveryWhere the communication was an offer of the item, an objective reasonable person would have understood it as such, the claimant performed its conditions and a writing satisfies the statute of frauds, the claimant is entitled to delivery4internal
FraudMadeOutThe elements of a cause of action for fraud are representation of a material existing fact, falsity, scienter, deception and injury, and the misrepresentation must be collateral or an inducement to a separate agreement (New York Univ. v. Continental Ins.; Channel Master; Bridgestone/Firestone; Deerfield; Stewart v. Jackson & Nash)1internal
GoverningLawWhereAdvertiserAcceptedIf the communication was a solicitation to receive offers, the last act necessary to complete the contract is the advertiser's acceptance of the order form, and the law of the place of that act governs (Jemco; and see note 16)2internal
GoverningLawWhereOffereeAcceptedIf the communication was an offer, the last act necessary to complete the contract is the offeree's acceptance, and the law of the place of that act governs (Jemco)1internal
HowAReasonablePersonWouldUnderstandIsForTheCourtDetermining how a reasonable, objective person would have understood a communication is an inquiry commonly performed by courts on a motion for summary judgment (Krumme; Bourque; Wards Co.)1internal
IndefinitenessRebutsDefinitenessAn advertisement shown to be indefinite as to the item is not clear, definite and explicit as to it1internal
LefkowitzExceptionWhere the advertisement is clear, definite and explicit, identifies the person who could accept and leaves nothing open for negotiation, it constitutes an offer, acceptance of which will complete the contract (Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store; Johnson v. Capital City Ford)1internal
NoContractUntilTheAdvertiserAcceptsThere is no enforceable contract until the advertiser accepts the order form and processes payment (Mesaros)1internal
ObjectiveUnderstandingEstablishedWhether an offer was made depends on the objective reasonableness of the alleged offeree's belief that the advertisement was intended as an offer, and that is for the court to determine (Kay-R Elec.; Mesaros; Farnsworth § 3.10; Williston § 4:7)1internal
ReciprocalPromiseRebutsTheRewardCharacterAn advertisement that seeks a reciprocal promise is an offer to negotiate, not a promise of reward (Carbolic Smoke Ball per Bowen L.J.; Lovett)1internal
ReservationToASeparateWritingMakesIndefiniteAn advertisement that reserves the details of the alleged offer to a separate writing which contains no entry for the item is not sufficiently definite as to that item1internal
SignedWritingEstablishingTheRelationshipSufficesA writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought which by itself establishes a contractual relationship between the parties satisfies the statute of frauds (N.Y.U.C.C. § 2-201(1); Crabtree; Horn & Hardart; O'Keeffe v. Bry)1internal
SubmissionOfTheOrderFormIsTheOfferAdvertisements and order forms are mere notices and solicitations for offers which create no power of acceptance in the recipient; the completed order form with the required points is the offer (Mesaros; Foremost Pro Color; Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 26; Alligood)1internal
SubtleSocialDynamicsAreForTheJuryA question whose answer requires current real-life experience of subtle social dynamics is particularly appropriate for a jury (Gallagher v. Delaney)1internal
priority_rule — 5
УзелПодписьАнкеры §194
CarbolicOverTheGeneralRuleThe reward exception prevails over the general rule1internal
ContractForFiveHundredOrMoreIsUnenforceableWithoutAWriting/priorityA contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought (N.Y.U.C.C. § 2-201(1))1internal
IndefinitenessOverTheFaceA showing of indefiniteness prevails over the face of the advertisement1internal
LefkowitzOverTheGeneralRuleThe Lefkowitz exception prevails over the general rule1internal
ReciprocalPromiseOverRewardSeeking a reciprocal promise prevails over the appearance of a reward1internal
norm_template — 1
УзелПодписьАнкеры §194
DeliverTheItemWhere the claimant is entitled to delivery, the seller owes the claimant delivery of the item — the specific performance plaintiff sought1internal
external_decl — 1
УзелПодписьАнкеры §194
reasonable_person_would_understand_as_offer/externalan objective, reasonable person would have understood the communication to convey an offer of the item1internal
fragment — 19
УзелПодписьАнкеры §194
LP_S_Iinternal
LP_S_IIinternal
LP_S_IIIinternal
LP_S_II_Ainternal
LP_S_II_A_1internal
LP_S_II_A_2internal
LP_S_II_Binternal
LP_S_II_B_1internal
LP_S_II_B_2internal
LP_S_II_Cinternal
LP_S_II_C_1internal
LP_S_II_C_2internal
LP_S_II_C_3internal
LP_S_II_C_4internal
LP_S_II_Dinternal
LP_S_II_Einternal
LP_S_I_Ainternal
LP_S_I_Binternal
LP_S_NOTESinternal
publication — 1
УзелПодписьАнкеры §194
LP_TEXTinternal
source_edition — 1
УзелПодписьАнкеры §194
LP_REPORTERF. Supp. 2d, volume 88, page 116 (West), as digitized by the Caselaw Access Projectinternal
source_work — 1
УзелПодписьАнкеры §194
LEONARD_V_PEPSICOLeonard v. PepsiCo, Inc., 88 F. Supp. 2d 116 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)internal