Источник / закреплённая редакция
Derived Categories
Источник пакета stacks.derived_functors · The Stacks Project, Chapter «Derived Categories» (tag 05QI)
- work
- urn:stacks:clir:derived-functors#STACKS_DERIVED
- номер
- The Stacks Project, Chapter «Derived Categories» (tag 05QI)
- вид
- urn:stacks:clir:derived-functors#treatise
derived.tex at commit a04446e (master, 2026-07-28)
- edition
- urn:stacks:clir:derived-functors#STACKS_DERIVED_MASTER
- язык
- en
- официальность
- official
- материализация
- PINNED_OFFICIAL_BYTES
- жизненный цикл
- adopted: 2026-07-28
Публикации
| URI | Тип | documentHash | Получено |
|---|---|---|---|
| https://raw.githubusercontent.com/stacks/stacks-project/a04446e57ec1fbc252a871afcec7752fb2807b14/derived.tex | application/x-tex; charset=utf-8 | sha256:efda4cb361dd40909d1991161eae716e58b6cf9e79380971502e1da12396d402 | 2026-09-06T00:00:00Z |
Фрагменты — 16
tag/013I · defn · на него ссылаются: 13
en · official · sha256:7330949afd1629e09a53e8833569efe91f5d8ca6b7368e0a68a87d0caa530934EN
\begin{definition}
\label{definition-injective-resolution}
Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category.
Let $A \in \Ob(\mathcal{A})$.
An {\it injective resolution of $A$} is a complex
$I^\bullet$ together with a map $A \to I^0$ such
that:
\begin{enumerate}
\item We have $I^n = 0$ for $n < 0$.
\item Each $I^n$ is an injective object of $\mathcal{A}$.
\item The map $A \to I^0$ is an isomorphism onto $\Ker(d^0)$.
\item We have $H^i(I^\bullet) = 0$ for $i > 0$.
\end{enumerate}
Hence $A[0] \to I^\bullet$ is a quasi-isomorphism.
In other words the complex
$$
\ldots \to 0 \to A \to I^0 \to I^1 \to \ldots
$$
is acyclic.
Let $K^\bullet$ be a complex in $\mathcal{A}$.
An {\it injective resolution of $K^\bullet$} is a complex
$I^\bullet$ together with a map $\alpha : K^\bullet \to I^\bullet$
of complexes such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item We have $I^n = 0$ for $n \ll 0$, i.e., $I^\bullet$ is bounded below.
\item Each $I^n$ is an injective object of $\mathcal{A}$.
\item The map $\alpha : K^\bullet \to I^\bullet$ is a
quasi-isomorphism.
\end{enumerate}
\end{definition}Ссылаются нормы: InjectiveResolutionComputesRF, InjectiveResolutionResolves, ResolutionByQuasiIsomorphism, RightDerivedByResolution, acyclic_in_positive_degrees, augmentation_onto_kernel, bounded_below, injective_resolution, injective_resolution/necessary, injective_resolution/sufficient, quasi_isomorphism_from_shift, terms_injective, vanishes_in_negative_degrees
tag/013K · lemma · на него ссылаются: 1
en · official · sha256:869cffaf0235a6f9d2d38c26d042d9ff1c0bbfae733cd1cdcc72af28b5bc8fa4EN
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-injective-resolutions-exist}
Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category.
Assume $\mathcal{A}$ has enough injectives.
\begin{enumerate}
\item Any object of $\mathcal{A}$ has an injective resolution.
\item If $H^n(K^\bullet) = 0$ for all $n \ll 0$ then
$K^\bullet$ has an injective resolution.
\item If $K^\bullet$ is a complex with $K^n = 0$ for $n < a$, then
there exists an injective resolution $\alpha : K^\bullet \to I^\bullet$
with $I^n = 0$ for $n < a$ such that each $\alpha^n : K^n \to I^n$ is
injective.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}Ссылаются нормы: InjectiveResolutionsExist
tag/0157 · defn · на него ссылаются: 2
en · official · sha256:4f7053d7253056bd73774874a7759dc3c2be34cd7e4d6223cfeddd34df6fb0bcEN
\begin{definition}
\label{definition-derived-functor}
In
Situation \ref{situation-classical}.
\begin{enumerate}
\item The {\it right derived functors of $F$} are the partial functors
$RF$ associated to cases (1) and (2) of
Situation \ref{situation-classical}.
\item The {\it left derived functors of $F$} are the partial functors
$LF$ associated to cases (3) and (4) of
Situation \ref{situation-classical}.
\item An object $A$ of $\mathcal{A}$ is said to be
{\it right acyclic for $F$}, or {\it acyclic for $RF$}
if $A[0]$ computes $RF$.
\item An object $A$ of $\mathcal{A}$ is said to be
{\it left acyclic for $F$}, or {\it acyclic for $LF$}
if $A[0]$ computes $LF$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{definition}Ссылаются нормы: RightAcyclicByComputing, shift_zero
tag/015A · defn · на него ссылаются: 2
en · official · sha256:7ecd153a29139bad7c85e08acd4818c3aedb736903c0a95c5400227dea7d508dEN
\begin{definition}
\label{definition-higher-derived-functors}
Let $F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ be an additive functor
between abelian categories. Assume
$RF : D^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^{+}(\mathcal{B})$ is everywhere
defined. Let $i \in \mathbf{Z}$.
The {\it $i$th right derived functor $R^iF$ of $F$} is the functor
$$
R^iF = H^i \circ RF :
\mathcal{A}
\longrightarrow
\mathcal{B}
$$
\end{definition}Ссылаются нормы: RightDerivedByResolution, cohomology_of
tag/015B · lemma · на него ссылаются: 2
en · official · sha256:dfebd11201136d7893be34773ff7fda188a8b1936ac0ddeff5a25c3f02c5f5a0EN
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-higher-derived-functors}
Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category with enough injectives.
Let $F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ be a left exact functor.
\begin{enumerate}
\item For any short exact sequence
$0 \to A^\bullet \to B^\bullet \to C^\bullet \to 0$
of complexes in $\text{Comp}^{+}(\mathcal{A})$ there
is an associated long exact sequence
$$
\ldots \to
H^i(RF(A^\bullet)) \to
H^i(RF(B^\bullet)) \to
H^i(RF(C^\bullet)) \to
H^{i + 1}(RF(A^\bullet)) \to \ldots
$$
\item The functors $R^iF : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$
are zero for $i < 0$. Also $R^0F = F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$.
\item We have $R^iF(I) = 0$ for $i > 0$ and $I$ injective.
\item The sequence $(R^iF, \delta)$ forms a universal $\delta$-functor (see
Homology, Definition \ref{homology-definition-universal-delta-functor})
from $\mathcal{A}$ to $\mathcal{B}$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}Ссылаются нормы: DerivedUniversalDeltaFunctor, LongExactSequence
tag/015C · lemma · на него ссылаются: 1
en · official · sha256:d0947fabef80aaa804f6f4635edca13dba8e17d1cdf28aacd25709217ffafa46EN
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-F-acyclic}
Let $F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ be an additive functor
between abelian categories and assume
$RF : D^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^{+}(\mathcal{B})$ is everywhere
defined. Let $A$ be an object of $\mathcal{A}$.
\begin{enumerate}
\item $A$ is right acyclic for $F$ if and only if
$F(A) \to R^0F(A)$ is an isomorphism and $R^iF(A) = 0$ for all $i > 0$,
\item if $F$ is left exact, then $A$ is right acyclic for $F$
if and only if $R^iF(A) = 0$ for all $i > 0$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}Ссылаются нормы: HigherDerivedVanishForAcyclic
tag/015E · lemma · на него ссылаются: 3
en · official · sha256:d50febff637ad15f523e1d151117f8b2d94f768d9f3d3ab188837d89f7ddcabfEN
\begin{lemma}[Leray's acyclicity lemma]
\label{lemma-leray-acyclicity}
Let $F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ be an additive functor
between abelian categories. Let $A^\bullet$ be a bounded below complex
of right $F$-acyclic objects such that $RF$ is defined at
$A^\bullet$\footnote{For example this holds if
$RF : D^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^{+}(\mathcal{B})$ is everywhere defined.}.
The canonical map
$$
F(A^\bullet) \longrightarrow RF(A^\bullet)
$$
is an isomorphism in $D^{+}(\mathcal{B})$, i.e., $A^\bullet$ computes
$RF$.
\end{lemma}Ссылаются нормы: LerayAcyclicity, ResolutionByQuasiIsomorphism, terms_right_acyclic_for
tag/015M · lemma · на него ссылаются: 2
en · official · sha256:d107facc91c19d9cb0f08172be60381e0686a02742a3a98e6272ac70647e3f71EN
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-compose-derived-functors}
Let $\mathcal{A}, \mathcal{B}, \mathcal{C}$ be abelian categories.
Let $F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ and $G : \mathcal{B} \to \mathcal{C}$
be left exact functors. Assume $\mathcal{A}$, $\mathcal{B}$ have
enough injectives. The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $F(I)$ is right acyclic for $G$ for each injective object $I$
of $\mathcal{A}$, and
\item the canonical map
$$
t : R(G \circ F) \longrightarrow RG \circ RF.
$$
is isomorphism of functors from $D^{+}(\mathcal{A})$ to $D^{+}(\mathcal{C})$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}Ссылаются нормы: ComposeRightDerived, maps_injectives_to_acyclics
tag/05S9 · defn
en · official · sha256:044a2efee16ab10a34e3bb64e608c8cf8292260bff8d6e4acf41d4d41c2dca12EN
\begin{definition}
\label{definition-right-derived-functor-defined}
Assumptions and notation as in
Situation \ref{situation-derived-functor}.
Let $X \in \Ob(\mathcal{D})$.
\begin{enumerate}
\item we say the {\it right derived functor $RF$ is defined at}
$X$ if the ind-object
$$
(X/S) \longrightarrow \mathcal{D}', \quad
(s : X \to X') \longmapsto F(X')
$$
is essentially constant\footnote{For a discussion of when an ind-object
or pro-object of a category is essentially constant we refer to
Categories, Section \ref{categories-section-essentially-constant}.};
in this case the value
$Y$ in $\mathcal{D}'$ is called the {\it value of $RF$ at $X$}.
\item we say the {\it left derived functor $LF$ is defined at} $X$
if the pro-object
$$
(S/X) \longrightarrow \mathcal{D}', \quad
(s: X' \to X) \longmapsto F(X')
$$
is essentially constant; in this case the value $Y$ in $\mathcal{D}'$
is called the {\it value of $LF$ at $X$}.
\end{enumerate}
By abuse of notation we often denote the values simply
$RF(X)$ or $LF(X)$.
\end{definition}tag/05SV · defn · на него ссылаются: 1
en · official · sha256:c124773f22d16f9d536cdae2abb40060d15bf3c1c27bb039bd7c07afbfc95e45EN
\begin{definition}
\label{definition-everywhere-defined}
In
Situation \ref{situation-derived-functor}.
We say $F$ is {\it right derivable}, or that $RF$ {\it everywhere defined}
if $RF$ is defined at every object of $\mathcal{D}$.
We say $F$ is {\it left derivable}, or that $LF$ {\it everywhere defined}
if $LF$ is defined at every object of $\mathcal{D}$.
\end{definition}Ссылаются нормы: RFEverywhereDefined
tag/05SX · defn · на него ссылаются: 3
en · official · sha256:a12a542d90fce40869d878a5e1f1be4adaed0407a78b0a5d0febeb73e30ca0b5EN
\begin{definition}
\label{definition-computes}
In
Situation \ref{situation-derived-functor}.
\begin{enumerate}
\item An object $X$ of $\mathcal{D}$ {\it computes} $RF$ if $RF$ is defined
at $X$ and the canonical map $F(X) \to RF(X)$ is an isomorphism.
\item An object $X$ of $\mathcal{D}$ {\it computes} $LF$ if $LF$ is defined
at $X$ and the canonical map $LF(X) \to F(X)$ is an isomorphism.
\end{enumerate}
\end{definition}Ссылаются нормы: InjectiveComplexComputesRF, RightAcyclicByComputing, RightDerivedByResolution
tag/05T4 · situation · на него ссылаются: 3
en · official · sha256:73730814b6a7e9b8d49b7668a97550e999f7324072caaedeab6d267a7f2bbbe6EN
\begin{situation}
\label{situation-classical}
Here $F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ is an additive functor between
abelian categories. This induces exact functors
$$
F : K(\mathcal{A}) \to K(\mathcal{B}), \quad
K^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to K^{+}(\mathcal{B}), \quad
K^{-}(\mathcal{A}) \to K^{-}(\mathcal{B}).
$$
See Lemma \ref{lemma-additive-exact-homotopy-category}.
We also denote $F$ the composition $K(\mathcal{A}) \to D(\mathcal{B})$,
$K^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^{+}(\mathcal{B})$, and
$K^{-}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^-(\mathcal{B})$ of $F$ with the localization
functor $K(\mathcal{B}) \to D(\mathcal{B})$, etc. This situation leads
to four derived functors we will consider in the following.
\begin{enumerate}
\item The right derived functor of
$F : K(\mathcal{A}) \to D(\mathcal{B})$
relative to the multiplicative system $\text{Qis}(\mathcal{A})$.
\item The right derived functor of
$F : K^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^{+}(\mathcal{B})$
relative to the multiplicative system $\text{Qis}^{+}(\mathcal{A})$.
\item The left derived functor of
$F : K(\mathcal{A}) \to D(\mathcal{B})$
relative to the multiplicative system $\text{Qis}(\mathcal{A})$.
\item The left derived functor of
$F : K^{-}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^{-}(\mathcal{B})$
relative to the multiplicative system $\text{Qis}^-(\mathcal{A})$.
\end{enumerate}
Each of these cases is an example of
Situation \ref{situation-derived-functor}.
\end{situation}Ссылаются нормы: InjectiveIsRightAcyclic, RFEverywhereDefined, applied_complex
tag/05TD · lemma · на него ссылаются: 2
en · official · sha256:e13afb6775b69471bfd612155b1855cc310461519f6e5d3727e4e64b18e7e5b7EN
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-left-exact-higher-derived}
Let $F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ be an additive functor
between abelian categories and assume
$RF : D^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^{+}(\mathcal{B})$ is everywhere
defined.
\begin{enumerate}
\item We have $R^iF = 0$ for $i < 0$,
\item $R^0F$ is left exact,
\item the map $F \to R^0F$ is an isomorphism if and
only if $F$ is left exact.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}Ссылаются нормы: NegativeDerivedVanish, R0AgreesIfLeftExact
tag/05TE · lemma · на него ссылаются: 1
en · official · sha256:949b05eff66291065b983c92020aa94af9ab868feaf33ac9dcca7776457d66f4EN
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-right-derived-delta-functor}
Let $F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ be an additive functor
between abelian categories and assume
$RF : D^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^{+}(\mathcal{B})$ is everywhere defined.
\begin{enumerate}
\item The functors $R^iF$, $i \geq 0$ come equipped with a canonical
structure of a $\delta$-functor from $\mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$, see
Homology, Definition \ref{homology-definition-cohomological-delta-functor}.
\item If every object of $\mathcal{A}$ is a subobject of a right
acyclic object for $F$, then $\{R^iF, \delta\}_{i \geq 0}$ is a
universal $\delta$-functor, see
Homology, Definition \ref{homology-definition-universal-delta-functor}.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}Ссылаются нормы: DerivedFormDeltaFunctor
tag/05TH · lemma · на него ссылаются: 3
en · official · sha256:e032a20e4fb0e18232eca1300982b8c867068569810bf8e4474e48073cab1465EN
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-injective-acyclic}
Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category.
Let $I \in \Ob(\mathcal{A})$ be an injective object.
Let $I^\bullet$ be a bounded below complex of injectives in $\mathcal{A}$.
\begin{enumerate}
\item $I^\bullet$ computes $RF$ relative to $\text{Qis}^{+}(\mathcal{A})$
for any exact functor $F : K^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to \mathcal{D}$
into any triangulated category $\mathcal{D}$.
\item $I$ is right acyclic for any additive functor
$F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ into any abelian category $\mathcal{B}$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}Ссылаются нормы: InjectiveComplexComputesRF, InjectiveIsRightAcyclic, InjectiveResolutionComputesRF
tag/05TI · lemma · на него ссылаются: 1
en · official · sha256:4d65e3bfe708a80785f85bd358981a9258f467f4705b132e3801b1a913a96651EN
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-enough-injectives-right-derived}
Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category with enough injectives.
\begin{enumerate}
\item For any exact functor $F : K^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to \mathcal{D}$
into a triangulated category $\mathcal{D}$ the right derived
functor
$$
RF : D^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \longrightarrow \mathcal{D}
$$
is everywhere defined.
\item For any additive functor $F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ into an
abelian category $\mathcal{B}$ the right derived functor
$$
RF : D^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \longrightarrow D^{+}(\mathcal{B})
$$
is everywhere defined.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}Ссылаются нормы: RFEverywhereDefined
Хэш рядом с текстом — sha256 его точных байтов. Он и есть проверка того, что показанный текст совпадает с закреплённым в пакете: расхождение роняет статику оракула.